This Friday, 1/6/23, the Supreme Court reviewed Brunson V Adams et.al. If 4 of the 9 Justices agree it will be placed on the Court docket to be heard. We will find out tomorrow morning if it will proceed.
This case refers to the actions of Congress exactly 2 years earlier on 1/6/21. On that date Congress met to vote on accepting each State's delegation of electors who would vote to confirm the results of the 2020 elections. Objections to the results of the election had been made earlier by over 100 Representatives and there were 1000 sworn affidavits of election impropriety. Congress had the opportunity as proscribed by law to send things back to the States (or at least to the States where most of the claims of election fraud had been made) for a 10 day period of election investigation.
The lawsuit contends that because they failed to do so even in the face of tremendous national doubt concerning the integrity of the election, they violated their oath to the Constitution and thus were guilty of treason. To be clear, the lawsuit is not whether the actual results of the election were fraudulent but whether Congress failed in their duty to protect the interest of the country by failing to use an option set forth in case there was legitimate concern about election interference. The relief requested of the Court is the removal from power of Biden, Harris and every politician who voted to accept the 2020 results, including Vice President Pence who was overseeing the process that day. In addition it would ban each of those people from ever serving in elected office again.
Even though this is the longest of long shots the story of how the Brunson lawsuit even got this far is amazing. As the suit was making its way through the different levels of courts the Brunsons (who are not lawyers) were contacted by a clerk from the Supreme Court with advice on how to correctly formulate the paperwork for the high court's purposes. The suit rose to the Circuit Court level who had 90 days to respond to the paperwork filed with them and because they failed to respond, on day 91 the Supreme Court fast tracked the case. So there must be at least one Justice who wants an open hearing before the Nation and the Court.
Speculation is that some Justices were horrified as more and more information started coming out about election interference by certain agencies of the government (think 3 letter intelligence) and their possible ties to foreign governments. If so and if this lawsuit goes forward the pressure on the Justices and their families safety will be intense. Pray for them.
