A few weeks ago a friend and
ex-neighbor of ours called and asked for prayers. She and her
husband would be traveling to Vietnam with a missions group
consisting of people who had served in the US military during that
war. While there her husband and a few other men would be returning
a Vietnamese helmet that was brought home in 1968 by one of the men
as a war souvenir. Our friend wanted prayers because she was worried
that there might be a negative response to their intended
presentation and also because even after 46 years her husband still
struggled with memories from his time in Vietnam.
A couple of weeks later I'm turning on
my Yahoo mail page and notice in the news clips a photo of an
Vietnamese helmet, white dove scratched onto it, with the caption
that it was returned to the family of it's original owner. Clicking
onto the link I see a photo of four men my age, very serious looks on
their faces, dressed in blue shirts and khaki pants, walking through
a rural village, towering over the crowd of people walking behind
them, and each holding a corner of a small platform upon which is
sitting the said helmet. The man in the right rear was my friend.
The Yahoo article gives the story of
how and why the helmet was returned as well as the reaction of the 52
year old nephew of the slain soldier. “This is a very sacred
moment for my extended family.” The nephew “wept as the helmet
was placed in front of a family altar in his house. The Americans,
along with around 100 villagers and local officials gathered for the
ceremony, looked on. 'We consider this helmet as part of him and we
will keep as a reminder for our family's future generations,' he
said.”
The Vietnam war was going full bore in
1968, the year I graduated from high school and started college. It
was not a popular conflict for several reasons, the chief of which
was the inability for our government to communicate to the American
public what exactly “winning” meant while being mired in a land
war thousands of miles away in the jungles of Southeast Asia. I had
an older brother who graduated from Notre Dame a year previous and
while there shared a house with a bunch of anti-war radicals. Clear
memories I have of going to bed, my brother coming home late from
college and then listing to my father and brother yelling at each
other about the war for a couple of hours. This happened several
times.
My father hated war. He served as a
fighter pilot in WWII, had his planes shot up a bunch of times and
the last time needed to bail out over the Mediterranean. His unit
suffered 170% casualties. As fast as the new guys would come in they
would be shot down. When he came back to the US the people in charge
wanted him to tour to promote to young men “the glories of war.”
to get them to enlist. The idea disgusted my dad. He fully
supported the cause and yet saw too much blood and suffering to call
it glorious.
But when young men with radical ideas,
taught by professors that actually support Communist theory (ignoring
the history of 30 million dead in Russia and 60 million dead in
China), come at a proud vet and financially successful self made man
with the argument that our military/industrial machine who is
actually running our government is engaging in war for financial
reasons for the benefit of small group of capitalist fat cats, well .
. . you think there wouldn't be yelling? Eventually though my father
got really mad at the bombing campaign in Cambodia. He sent a nasty
telegram to President Nixon and got rewarded a few months later by
being audited for the first time.
My brother became a conscientious
objector and did alternate service after college. He did not believe that Vietnam was what his Catholic professors would call a "just war." I am proud of him
for that. On the other hand I had high school classmates that enlisted, two who gave
their lives in Vietnam, but I went on to college in the fall of 1968.
If called I would have gone, I believed the cause was both just and necessary, but honestly for me and for most people
I knew there was no great desire to volunteer to go off and fight in
the jungles of Asia.
While I was in college the government
instituted a draft in December of 1969 and had a lottery to assign
draft priorities for men born from the years 1944 to 1950. We had a
deferment for the time we were in college but there was still a lot of
anxiety for the guys in my class to find out the draft order of our
birthdays. I remember the guy who got number 1. He walked around in
a daze for about a week. Perhaps part of that was the party we held
for him. My number was 140. By the time the draft ended in 1973
a year after I graduated from college the selection number was up to 120.
You are not going to get a straight
story from the press about our efforts and the after effects of the Communist take over of South Vietnam. Liberals like socialism and
dislike what they consider the inequalities created by capitalism. They love the idea of pure Communism and so
ignore the overwhelming weight of Communist disasters in history. Ninety
per cent of college professors consider themselves liberal. They
teach and help form the young minds that become the Eastern media and that media reports what it believes is truth without imagining they are in any way biased. For example, the Yahoo
article with my friend saw fit to remark that “a bust of Ho Chi
Minh, Vietnam's victorious war time leader was also in the room”
and that “up to 3 million Vietnamese were killed in the war which
the United States undertook to stop the spread of Communism in
Southeast Asia.” You would think South Vietnam didn't exist and
we were the invaders.
I have met a lot of people from Vietnam,
Cambodia and Laos. Many needed to leave their countries because to
stay would be to die. A lot of them lived many years in refugee camps
before coming to America. I met a Vietnamese guy last week whose
father worked for the CIA and who had also been employed by the CIA.
He was in the same prison camp as John McCain for two years.
Although a lot of the people I know have been able to return to visit,
this man and his family are not welcome. He says he doesn't care,
this is his country, he and his family are Americans and he is thrilled that he doesn't have to live
under Communism.
Things have changed quite a bit in
Vietnam since the war. Like China they are now open for business and
the quality of goods for the common person are gradually improving,
although I am told that the good stuff all goes for export.
After the killing fields of Pol Pot in Cambodia the Communism dominoes did stop falling, although many countries still struggle with insurgencies. The halt of the spread of world wide Communism has a lot to do with the collapse of state controlled and planned economies
that could not compete in the global market. They had to change to
survive or become like North Korea, but there is further revolution
coming. Communist countries are run by a cadre of elites whose
families benefit the greatest from the system. In the past most people
could be kept in the dark about life in the rest of the world but not
anymore.
There is politics involved in all foreign policy decisions. It would be great if we could trust that our leaders were strong morally and always have in mind the best interests both of the United States and the other countries we interact with. But times are changing and right and wrong are being redefined. Some think it would be better if our country was weak. They despise our past, want to change our traditions and work to determine our future. The moral glue that has held us together from our countries founding is coming undone, replaced by love of self and hate of absolutes.
Yet men and women are still called to serve, to risk leg and limb, mind and body for something that is bigger than them. They will do this with good leaders and with bad and they do not get to debate while they serve, apart from clear moral boundaries, the wisdom of every order. My friend came back from the horrors of war to a country that was divided over the conflict he served in and he and his generation were not embraced. Yet he still suffers for you and me, for the cause of freedom, for the hope that others will be blessed with what we take as our birthright.
There is politics involved in all foreign policy decisions. It would be great if we could trust that our leaders were strong morally and always have in mind the best interests both of the United States and the other countries we interact with. But times are changing and right and wrong are being redefined. Some think it would be better if our country was weak. They despise our past, want to change our traditions and work to determine our future. The moral glue that has held us together from our countries founding is coming undone, replaced by love of self and hate of absolutes.
Yet men and women are still called to serve, to risk leg and limb, mind and body for something that is bigger than them. They will do this with good leaders and with bad and they do not get to debate while they serve, apart from clear moral boundaries, the wisdom of every order. My friend came back from the horrors of war to a country that was divided over the conflict he served in and he and his generation were not embraced. Yet he still suffers for you and me, for the cause of freedom, for the hope that others will be blessed with what we take as our birthright.
No comments:
Post a Comment